Tangential to the content of this post at best, so forgive me as this is just the latest place to share some OT commentary with this community.
Unsure how I feel about this Hollinger opinion piece from today about how MNBA teams should be looking more and more at harvesting coaching talent from the W:
Nice to see Coach Nakase get some deserved flowers but it's a bit of a sour compliment IMO.
Sure, it's an objectively bigger stage, and I bet the coaching jobs pay more. The M also pays the players a lot more. There's just a lot more money all around. That's been a problem for a long time, though we are starting to see that changing.
But this type of thinking also is rooted in a framing that the W is and will continue to be a lesser league, and that coaches should see job offers with the M an opportunity to lift themselves up outta that. Leaning into this thinking by suggesting good W coaches need to be "moved up" to the M simply reinforces existing belief systems that contribute to lesser/inequitable outcomes for the W.
It also implies a point of view that the nature of players and gameplay are similar enough between the leagues that coaching efficacy can and will readily translate from one to another.
It's only one example, but we've already seen this year how NYL did under Chris DeMarco - recall that before the season started, he openly admitted he hadn't watched the W or been super familiar with the Liberty before he got hired on (which sounds like a galaxy-brain GM problem, but still...)
Why Hollinger feels the need to push this line instead of keeping it to himself, or better yet, putting the weight of his writing behind pushing for more equitable outcomes is beyond me. I won't make any declaratives about the reasons why, which may be rooted in structural and/or personal belief systems (whether self-aware or not), but I could make some guesses.