«OpenAI can have GPT lie to the developer, which can have GPT lie to the user, which can have GPT lie to third parties. That’s not new. Also not new is this principle, which it is important we keep: "Under our Red-line principles, OpenAI commits to never overriding objectivity in ChatGPT (e.g., via a system or developer message)."»
This is pure "distraction" bullshit because there is no need for OpenAI to make GPT lie or to override its "objectivity" "via a system or developer message" because:
* If you chat with any western (and some chinese...) LLMs on controversial issues it will as a rule deliver forcefully all the talking points of "centrist liberal capitalism" on most controversial subjects and if you object mentioning different opinions and that neither side has compelling evidence they will not stop and insist that everything happened as per the talking points.
* This is not achieved "via a system or developer message" because it is unnecessary if the training gives high "credibility" to the NYT, WaPo and other megaphones of "centrist liberal capitalism" and omits or underweights opposing views. When the LLMs insist on the centrist liberal capitalist" talking points they are not lying they sincerely "believe" them because it is what they "remember" as credible, by construction during training.
Surprise! and this is just for the liberal-conservative axis as to *domestic* USA politics. On foreign policy controversies the top LLMs usually repeat enthusiastically and insistently the talking points from "Foreign Affairs".
Indeed that is what "alignment in practice should mean: which democracy-loving USA patriot would want LLMs to be platforms enabling attacks on free speech in the USA by Trump, MAGA, Russia, HAMAS, China, Iran with their poisonous lies? Government regulation must ensure the alignment of top LLMs the objective truth. :-)