Skip to content

missing CVE data #206

Open
Open

Description

@mcandre

Docker Scout treats images vulnerable to CVE-2025-11579 as having a clean bill of health with no CVE's.

Whereas Snyk Container identifies this, and other CVE's in the Snyk Vulnerability Database.

https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11579

https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-GOLANG-GITHUBCOMNWAPLESRARDECODEV2-13537508

Can we please sync more data between the Docker Scout and Snyk databases? As a developer, it's confusing to see mutually exclusive security reports. Very, very, very often, Docker Scout and Snyk report completely different sets of CVE's.

Activity

  1. cdupuis commented on Oct 29, 2025

    @cdupuis
    Collaborator

    @mcandre, thanks for raising this. Scout has the same CVE as Snyk at https://scout.docker.com/vulnerabilities/id/CVE-2025-11579. Could you point me at an image where Scout is not reporting this CVE but Snyk is? Thanks.

  2. self-assigned this
    on Oct 29, 2025
  3. mcandre commented on Oct 29, 2025

    @mcandre
    Author

    Interesting.

    I saw the gap appear in several different places:

    • go.mod
    • go.sum
    • vendor from go mod vendor
    • Go executables built with rardecode dependencies
    • fs://. with the above, such as a git repository clone

    Docker Scout has ample SBOM files on both inages and hosts to trigger a finding, but it never does.

    The image and host directory tree involved are enterprise projects.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions